<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seth Godin&#8217;s post misses the point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/web-development-tips/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/web-development-tips/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/</link>
	<description>NetBlazon Company Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Petracco</title>
		<link>http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/web-development-tips/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Petracco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/uncategorized/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Seth - on that we are agreed. Shipping is something that stands out in the world of overhead costs; as you said, no one accepts or has likely ever seen a charge for retail fixtures, rent, security systems, etc. And to take it a step further: even consumers who accept a separate shipping charge, definitely don&#039;t like the idea of a separate handling charge (e.g. not rolled into &quot;shipping and handling&quot; together). 

New standards are definitely being set; free shipping is no longer an exception...it&#039;s fast becoming the norm.

Good points! Thanks, Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth &#8211; on that we are agreed. Shipping is something that stands out in the world of overhead costs; as you said, no one accepts or has likely ever seen a charge for retail fixtures, rent, security systems, etc. And to take it a step further: even consumers who accept a separate shipping charge, definitely don&#8217;t like the idea of a separate handling charge (e.g. not rolled into &#8220;shipping and handling&#8221; together). </p>
<p>New standards are definitely being set; free shipping is no longer an exception&#8230;it&#8217;s fast becoming the norm.</p>
<p>Good points! Thanks, Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth godin</title>
		<link>http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/web-development-tips/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>seth godin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netblazon.com/weblog/uncategorized/seth-godins-post-misses-the-point/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I worry that I was too brief in my post. My point wasn&#039;t that shipping is a rip off (it usually isn&#039;t) or that the shipping companies are easy to work with or fair to smbs (they&#039;re not). My point was that for a long time, consumers accepted the fact that there&#039;s a surcharge for shipping, but not for, say, mannikins or rent.

thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worry that I was too brief in my post. My point wasn&#8217;t that shipping is a rip off (it usually isn&#8217;t) or that the shipping companies are easy to work with or fair to smbs (they&#8217;re not). My point was that for a long time, consumers accepted the fact that there&#8217;s a surcharge for shipping, but not for, say, mannikins or rent.</p>
<p>thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

